PEEL, Inc.
Sucks
| NOTICE |
Website Disclaimer
of Don Thompson |
DISCLAIMER |
Disclaimer:
This site is intended to educate the public about
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr. and the
associated problems caused by his actions towards his contracted ISP's. Unlike
Tim's sites, all fundamental Constitutional rights to
speak, publish, and distribute speech are respected on this site. If any
copyrighted material is used, it is under the Fair Use Provision of the Copyright
Act - §107. The fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research, is not an
infringement of copyright.
"Truth is a
complete defense to an action for slander, even though [even if]
the words were spoken maliciously." Massachusetts General Laws,
M.G.L. §1213
"The wrong done to the plaintiff [i.e. should
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr. try to take legal action against me, they would be the Plaintiff in that case] is the injury to his reputation, and this is the only basis upon which an action for defamation may be grounded." M.G.L. §1201
"A pure opinion is not actionable no matter how unjustified and unreasonable the opinion may be or how derogatory it is." M.G.L. §1202
If you think
I am saying some harsh things about Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr. and
his employees, consider that, based on my experiences, the research I have done and the people I have spoken with or consulted with since
2000, extensive reading of the law and legal definitions, I truly believe that my conclusions, which constitute my opinions, are COMPLETELY TRUE and backed up by
documents, the law, and the facts.
I am not calling this company and its employees liars, frauds, and extortionists for malicious purposes.
My purpose is that I seem to be (like the little boy who noted that the emperor was wearing NO CLOTHES at all), the only
person
I know of (there may be others out there) who is willing to say THE TRUTH IN PRINT AND IN PUBLIC.
My purpose is to EXPOSE Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr.'s WRONGDOING; to change the paradigm so that
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr.'s crimes will be seen, not in euphemistic and vague terms of "unfair practices," "aggressive
account termination tactics," "risk management," "business," "untruths," and other vague and misleading terms that conceal or diminish the heinous nature of
his acts, but for what they REALLY ARE - fraud, deceit, extortion, crimes, lies
and harassment, etc.
In addition, in order for
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr. or named individuals to have a Cause of Action against
me for libel or slander, they would need proof that 1)their reputation was harmed and they suffered something as a result; 2)
MY WORDS were the direct cause of that harm. In
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr.'s case,
no proof exists that it was my actions or words that damaged their reputations since there are many, many more causes of damage to their reputations,
such as
the numerous other unhappy people before me who you can read about
on this site, and who still have unanswered complaints (like
mine) with the Better Business Bureau.
I'm pretty sure that in order for any individual to sue
me for stating the truth about them, they would have to show harm, i.e. an adverse employment situation as a result of my statements. In the case of most
of Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr.'s employees who are doing wrong, the converse is true. They get raises, bonuses, and/or promotions (or at the very least
praise) for being willing to do and say things (right or wrong) as
ordered, and defend this criminal organization and their own actions. Their reputation is already tarnished simply by their employment with
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr.. The reason for this being, Tim can ill
afford to surround himself with anyone who has a backbone.
In addition I do not simply publish unsupported opinions. I have meticulously backed up my opinions with documents
prior to forming my opinions about Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr. and
his organization.
In fact I DON'T want to harm
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr.
or his employees. My purpose is not malice. I simply want them to see the error of their ways, and start acting ethically and legally.
I DON'T want this company to go bankrupt as that would serve NO ONE
and only hurt those innocent people that have placed their trust in
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr.,
as I once did.
I DO BELIEVE that a change in management
tactics to ethical and legal standards of the law is needed, and
that Tim should be held accountable for the harm, pain, and
suffering he has caused others by his wrongful actions.
"Where the defamatory communication consists of a statement in the form of an opinion, it is actionable ONLY if the statement implies the allegation of UNDISCLOSED DEFAMATORY FACTS as the basis for the opinion." M.G.L. §1202
I have attempted to disclose ALL THE FACTS that support my opinions.
Unless
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr. or other named individuals allege that (and must be able to prove) that the statements were false, or if true, made maliciously, then they have no
cause of action against me.
The damages must be, not to the self-esteem of the defendant [i.e.
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr. or named individuals], but "in the opinion of others." M.G.L. §1207
Even if I render opinions about named individuals, they can't prove that "in the opinion of others" their reputations were damaged by MY STATEMENTS, when there is the huge issue of the fact that they WORK FOR
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr., and their employer has been exposed in many ways, as mentioned above.
In reality, many of us would have causes of action for libel and
slander against Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr. and the individuals
under his control.
"[A] plaintiff [i.e.
Timothy L. Drobnick, Sr.] whose reputation is so poor that it cannot be further damaged may be
libel proof, and he is not entitled to burden a defendant [me] with a trial." M.G.L. §1208
In addition, to the extent that anything
I'm saying is not true, I have time and time again, told
Timothy
L. Drobnick, Sr., and in that I include any named individuals, that if any of
my opinions and the FACTS supporting them are not completely true, all they need to do is to provide me with the COMPELLING PROOF IN WRITING [not just meaningless outrage and denials] of the falsity of the statement and I will publish a retraction. In any event I will publish on this site any response from any person who thinks they have been libeled or slandered by me, and the readers of this site can determine for themselves whether my words are true or not. However if I am not convinced that the response proves the falsity of my statements I will not issue a retraction.
In addition, of course, as a writer and editor of an Internet website, as well as a citizen of the United States, I have protection under the First Amendment. I am not forcing ANYONE to read my site or my words, much less believe them.
But just to re-iterate, I am human, I
get involved, daily, in extremely stressful legal situations in hostile legal environments
while trying to help others. I sometimes suffer from emotional,
stress related problems, exhaustion, and to some extent I think my
tired, 55 year old brain may be to some degree responsible for an occasional lapse in self-control or poor judgment which I might exhibit.
If anyone thinks I have libeled or slandered them on this site or otherwise, simply put your concerns in writing. As I
have said, if your proof is more compelling than my facts, I will issue a retraction, and in any event I will publish your letter so that
my readers can decide for themselves.
Please send your complaint letters and supporting documents in a form that can be easily posted on the website if you want your arguments posted (i.e. e-mail or computer disc as opposed to hard copies).
Donald Thompson
E-mail:
Don Thompson
|
